Friday, May 1, 2009

Souter retires

Obama gets a Supreme Court vacancy very early, with David Souter, George H.W. Bush's first Supreme Court appointee, calling it quits today. My guess is that he probably would have liked to retire before now, but held out until he knew a President was ensconced in the Oval Office who would replace him with another activist justice.

Of all of the Supreme Court picks of the last 30 years, Souter was the most deftly stealthy; I could be more unkind and say "sneaky" instead. Souter managed to convey to Bush 41 a completely opposite impression of the kind of justice he would turn out to be, especially on the Roe v. Wade issue. ABC legal correspondent Jan Crawford Greenburg has written the most readable book I know of on the Supreme Court and it tells this whole story in detail. (It is called Supreme Conflict: The Inside Story of the Struggle for Control of the United States Supreme Court.)

The only regrettable aspect of Souter's departure at this juncture is that Obama is likely to tap a much younger person in his place who will serve for several decades.

But, the ideological make-up of the Court will not change.

1 comment:

danny said...

Glen
When it comes to the Supreme court, I get fueled. These individules can last generations.
Here in lies the true power of the President. At this moment in history, Obama may get three or even four, if he makes eight years, forever changing the idea of America. I just wish people would think of these things when voting. I do not beleive that the change Obama promised is the change the average voter anticipated or even understands. He is a President who truly beleives in the noble idea of socialism, and beleives this will make the world a better place.
Is it possible to educate the voting public (in 18 months time) that the real power is in the house and senate, and positive change would come by dumping them all.
Obamas nominations and policies could at least be controled. Much like what happened to Clinton in 94.